STRATEGI PENGHIDUPAN RUMAHTANGGA DI KECAMATAN PATAMUAN KABUPATEN PADANG PARIAMAN PASCA GEMPA BUMI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN 2009
| Main Authors: | , SITI RUKAYAH, , Prof. Dr. Hadi Sabari Yunus, M.A.,DRS |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130506/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70929 |
Daftar Isi:
- The Research of household livelihood strategies of Patamuan District after West Sumatra earthquake is motivated by changes in socio-economic conditions of the District Patamuan due to the earthquake. West Sumatra earthquake in 2009 caused the loss of life and destruction of the physical environment including homes and public facilities that have an impact on social and economic losses caused people need to adjust livelihood strategies to maintain their live survival. This research aims to get an overview of the vulnerability of the household after the West Sumatra earthquake in 2009 and analyzing household livelihood strategies in Patamuan District of West Sumatra post earthquake in 2009. The research method used in this is to survey sampling using quantitative for analysis. The results of this study indicate that the largest household vulnerability caused by as many as 61 low-income households (40.67%), damage to house a total of 32 households (21.33%), revenues decreased by 17 households (11.33%), household member dies by 4 households (2.67%), loss of employment as much as 3 households (2.00%), crop failure and the failure of their respective businesses as many as 25 people (16.67%) and 8 (5.33%). Livelihood strategy is generally made them household is survival strategy by buying low-quality rice by 50 households (33.33%), buy paddy that has not been ground into rice a total of 14 households (9.33%), and 25 households (16.67 %) in debt. Further consolidation strategy alone by planting cassava and vegetables consumed daily for a total of 29 households (19.34%), plant rice fields a total of 18 households (12%), selling small as 6 households (4%), and accumulation strategies in how to raise chickens as much as 8 households (5.33%).