ANALISIS MANAJEMEN BIAYA PROYEK PADA KAMPANYE PROYEK PENGEBORAN 2011-2012 DI STAR ENERGY GEOTHERMAL (WAYANG WINDU) Ltd
| Main Authors: | , Ferry Irawan, , Prof. Dr. Abdul Halim, M.B.A., Akt. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125575/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65744 |
Daftar Isi:
- This thesis aims to determine the application of project cost management by Star Energy Geothermal (Wayang Windu) Ltd. in its drilling project campaign 2011-2012 and determine achievements of goals within budget. The company is a subsidiary of Star Energy Holding Pte Ltd which engages in geothermal power plant business. The reason why companies are willing to apply project management and project cost management in particular is because the average cost performance in the previous drilling project campaign, i.e. drilling project campaign 2006-2007 and drilling project campaign 2009-2010 indicated low cost performance where cost overruns occurred This is a major problem for companies that were about to conduct drilling project campaigns 2011-2012. Project cost management program as a part of project management was launched to anticipate cost overrun and allow goals within budget to be achieved. Analysis of project cost management in the drilling project campaign 2011-2012 refers to A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) published by Project Management Institute Inc. The analysis result showed that the company has implemented project cost management in all stagest of the project properly as reflected on the positive cost variance which indicated that there were no cost overrun, on the value of cost performance index that is higher than 1 which indicated good cost performance, and on the value of forecasting variance percentage that is lower than 10 percent which indicated good cost control. Goals within budget was also achieved where the actual cost is lower than budget that allowed a cost cutting up to 15.36 percent.