KAJIAN YURIDIS TENTANG RANGKAP JABATAN NOTARIS DAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH YANG TEMPAT KEDUDUKANNYA BERBEDA NAMUN MASIH DALAM SATU WILAYAH KERJA
| Main Authors: | , PUTU YOGA MAHENDRA WIDETYA, , Dwi Haryati S.H.,M.H. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118796/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58772 |
Daftar Isi:
- The writing of this thesis aims to examine the application of the implementation of the office of notary public notary office not so if a working area with office of PPAT. See the office of Notary and PPAT implementation in concrete or through practice and associated with the provision of the content of the regulations This research includes empirical juridical research, that the approach to the problem by examining the phenomenon in the problems encountered in the research associated with the regulations. Field research is carried out by means of an interview by using the tool in the form of guidelines for interviewing primary and secondary data are analyzed qualitatively by systematically compiled and analyzed based on the inductive method is drawn in a conclusion of each formulation problems. The results of research on a duplicate notary offices, and a different position where the PPAT but still in one region, in practice unenforceable because has no Office or seat caused by the difference in terms of article 17 the letter g of act No. 30/2004 and article 8 subsection (2) letter c government regulations No. 37 1998. So that implementation in the real term could not be implemented. As a result, did not run in the real post office arising from the violation of sanctions in the form of administrative : oral reprimand