PEMBAHASAN YURIDIS DALAM PUTUSAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MENIMBANG BENTUK SURAT DAKWAAN SUBSIDIAIR PASAL 2 DAN 3 UU NO.31 TAHUN 1999 JO UU NO.20 TAHUN 2001
| Main Authors: | , AGUSTINUS HERIMULYANTO, , Prof. Dr. Edward O.S. Hiariej, S.H., M.Hum. |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/100610/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=57134 |
Daftar Isi:
- This research aims to obtain answers to the problems y- Accusation for Article 2 and Article 3 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 juncto Law Number 20 Year 2001, and why the judge did not apply the procedure according to the Subsidiary-Accusation, and whether it was a misapplication of law/unlawful. This research method applied normative juridical legal research by examining secondary data consist of Indonesian regulations, jurisprudences of the Supreme Court, draft laws, research of corruption, legal law books, documents and court decisions. While the research technique used is documentary studies, especially the court decisions. y The results showed that subsidiar -accusation form (Primary: Article 2 Paragraph (1) Subsidiair