Studi Perbandingan Mengenai Perkembangan Kebudayaan Politik Antara Indonesia dan Mesir Dalam Konteks Demokratisasi
| Main Authors: | , KOHEI NAITO, , Prof. Dr. Budi Winarno MA |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed |
| Terbitan: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/100401/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=56591 |
Daftar Isi:
- This thesis is a comparative study between Indonesian and Egyptian case on political culture in the context of democratization. This thesis is aimed to know what the differences of those two countries� political culture are, and what makes them different. In order to find out the reasons, this thesis also sees the differences of three actors roles, consisting of political parties, social bodies and movements, and Islamic organization, in promoting socialization and political participation their own societies. This thesis adopts democratization theory and political culture theory. Saiful Mujani (2007) says that democratization in one country can be influenced by its political culture. Then, Gabriel Almond, and Sidney Verba (1963 and 1980) say that political culture in one country could can influenced by the experiences of citizen in socialization and political participation. In Indonesian and Egyptian cases, it can be said that citizen would experience them through the activities in some social actors, especially political parties, social bodies and movements, and Islamic organization. Therefore, this research is based on hypothesis that differences of those three actors� roles between the countries would cause citizen in each country to experience socialization and political participation differently, and then it would cause the differences of their political cultures. Conclusions of this thesis include at least three facts. First, both of Indonesian and Egyptian political culture can be categorized in same one, that is, combination of parochial-participant culture and subject-participant culture. But there are differences between them in sense that the component of participant culture is dominant within Indonesian political culture while there is balance of significance among three components, which consist of parochial, subject and participant culture, within Egyptian one, and also sense that evaluative orientation is outstanding citizen�s political orientation tends to be evaluative in Indonesia while affective in Egypt. Secondly, the roles of political parties in both two countries are not significant, while those of social bodies and movements are different between them. Then, although Islamic Organizations play an important role in both countries, their strategies and ideologies, which are quite distinct from each other, create the distinct kind and degree of impact on their own citizen�s experiences. Thirdly, it is the differences between two countries on the role of these three actors in each society that cause political cultures in the countries different.