ctrlnum 44104
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><relation>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/</relation><title>An Error Analysis on Writing Recount Text Made by &#xD; The Eighth Grade Students Of SMPN 3 Sawit Boyolali &#xD; in 2015/2016 Academic Year</title><creator>Ardiani, Adhe</creator><creator>-, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum</creator><subject>L Education (General)</subject><subject>PE English</subject><description>The objectives of the study are to describe an error analysis on writing &#xD; recount text made by eighth grade students of SMP N 3 Sawit Boyolali in their &#xD; written recount text, identify the types of morphological errors, syntactical errors &#xD; and discourse errors, describe the frequency type of errors; explain the dominant &#xD; type of error, identify the source of error and explaining the pedagogical implication &#xD; to teaching learning English as foreign language. The type of this research is &#xD; descriptive qualitative research. The researcher uses elicitation technique to collect &#xD; the data. There are three steps to collect the data, (1) the researcher enter the room &#xD; class and asks students to write a recount text, the researcher waits the students until &#xD; finish their works; (2) the researcher collects the data of students writing then reads &#xD; and marks the types of error that occur in students writing; (3) the researcher &#xD; documented the erroneous then classifies the type of errors based on linguistic &#xD; category and surface strategies category. The researcher uses James&#x2019;s theory to &#xD; classification of error, the researcher uses Slamet&#x2019;s theory to count the frequency of &#xD; types of error, and the researcher uses the theory from Brown to find the sources of &#xD; error. The result of the analysis shows that from seventy student&#x2019;s compositional &#xD; work, there are two hundred and seventy five errors which are grouped into three &#xD; main categories, namely: morphological error, syntactical error, and discourse &#xD; error. The highest frequency of errors is wrong spelling of morphological level (33 &#xD; errors or 12% of errors). The researcher also finds 2 sources of error, namely: &#xD; interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer.&#xD; &#xD; Keywords: error analysis, linguistic category, surface strategy taxonomy, recounts &#xD; text, source of error.</description><date>2016-06-08</date><type>Other:Karya Ilmiah</type><type>PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/4/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/2/CHAPTER%20I.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/9/CHAPTER%20II.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/10/CHAPTER%20III.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/11/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/12/CHAPTER%20V.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/18/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/21/APPENDIX.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/24/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/28/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf</identifier><identifier> Ardiani, Adhe and -, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum (2016) An Error Analysis on Writing Recount Text Made by The Eighth Grade Students Of SMPN 3 Sawit Boyolali in 2015/2016 Academic Year. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. </identifier><relation>A320120001</relation><recordID>44104</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Other:Karya Ilmiah
Other
PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed
PeerReview
File:application/pdf
File
author Ardiani, Adhe
-, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum
title An Error Analysis on Writing Recount Text Made by The Eighth Grade Students Of SMPN 3 Sawit Boyolali in 2015/2016 Academic Year
publishDate 2016
topic L Education (General)
PE English
url http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/4/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/2/CHAPTER%20I.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/9/CHAPTER%20II.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/10/CHAPTER%20III.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/11/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/12/CHAPTER%20V.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/18/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/21/APPENDIX.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/24/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/28/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/44104/
contents The objectives of the study are to describe an error analysis on writing recount text made by eighth grade students of SMP N 3 Sawit Boyolali in their written recount text, identify the types of morphological errors, syntactical errors and discourse errors, describe the frequency type of errors; explain the dominant type of error, identify the source of error and explaining the pedagogical implication to teaching learning English as foreign language. The type of this research is descriptive qualitative research. The researcher uses elicitation technique to collect the data. There are three steps to collect the data, (1) the researcher enter the room class and asks students to write a recount text, the researcher waits the students until finish their works; (2) the researcher collects the data of students writing then reads and marks the types of error that occur in students writing; (3) the researcher documented the erroneous then classifies the type of errors based on linguistic category and surface strategies category. The researcher uses James’s theory to classification of error, the researcher uses Slamet’s theory to count the frequency of types of error, and the researcher uses the theory from Brown to find the sources of error. The result of the analysis shows that from seventy student’s compositional work, there are two hundred and seventy five errors which are grouped into three main categories, namely: morphological error, syntactical error, and discourse error. The highest frequency of errors is wrong spelling of morphological level (33 errors or 12% of errors). The researcher also finds 2 sources of error, namely: interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer. Keywords: error analysis, linguistic category, surface strategy taxonomy, recounts text, source of error.
id IOS2728.44104
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
institution_id 249
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
library_id 555
collection Digital Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
repository_id 2728
subject_area Agama
Ekonomi
Farmasi
city KOTA SURAKARTA
province JAWA TENGAH
repoId IOS2728
first_indexed 2016-09-22T02:56:16Z
last_indexed 2016-09-22T02:56:20Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1765810954657857536
score 17.538404