An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students At The 7th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak In 2015/2016 Academic Year
ctrlnum |
43325 |
---|---|
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><relation>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/</relation><title>An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text
Made By Students At The 7th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak
In 2015/2016 Academic Year</title><creator>Istiqomah, Mufti</creator><creator>, Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum</creator><creator>, Siti Fatimah, S.Pd. M.Hum</creator><subject>L Education (General)</subject><subject>LB Theory and practice of education</subject><subject>LB1501 Primary Education</subject><description>The purposes of this research are: (1) to describe the types of morphological
error of writing descriptive text made by the seventh grade students of SMP N 1
Gatak in 2015/2016 academic year; (2)to describe the types of syntactical error; (3)to describe the types of discourse error; (4) to know the frequency of each error in
writing descriptive text; (5) to know the sources of errors. The type of this research is
descriptive qualitative research. The researcher uses linguistic category taxonomy
and surface strategy taxonomy by James in analyzing the data.
The result of this research is the researcher found 220 errors made by the
students, the errors are divided into three kinds of errors. The first type of error is
morphological error in wrong spelling (46 errors or 20,91 %). The second is
syntactical error (152 errors or 69,09%), this kind of errors are divided into seven
kinds of errors. The first is omission of –s/-es in plural marker (8 errors or 3,64%).
The second is error in Be, this error is divided into three: omission of Be (15 errors
or 6,81%); addition of Be (14 errors or 6,36%); misuse of Be (14 errors or 6,36%).
The third is omission of preposition (9 errors or 4,09%). The fourth is article, it is
divided into two: omission of article (8 errors or 3,64 %); addition of article (10
errors or 4,55 %). The fifth is omission of s/es for v1 after third person singular (20
errors or 9,09%). The sixth is error in pronoun, it is divided into three: omission of ‘s
in possessive pronoun (4 errors or 1,82 %); possessive for subjective pronoun (18
errors or 8,18 %); subjective for possessive pronoun (19 errors or 8,64 %). And the
last is misordering (13 errors or 5,91 %). The last type of error is discourse in
reference, 22 errors or 10%.

Key words: error analysis, descriptive text, linguistic category taxonomy, surface
strategy taxonomy.</description><date>2016-05-02</date><type>Other:Karya Ilmiah</type><type>PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/7/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/1/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/4/CHAPTER%201.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/8/CHAPTER%20II.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/9/CHAPTER%20III.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/10/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/16/CHAPTER%20V.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/17/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/18/APPENDIX.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/19/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI.pdf</identifier><identifier> Istiqomah, Mufti and , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum and , Siti Fatimah, S.Pd. M.Hum (2016) An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students At The 7th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak In 2015/2016 Academic Year. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. </identifier><relation>A320120075</relation><recordID>43325</recordID></dc>
|
language |
eng |
format |
Other:Karya Ilmiah Other PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed PeerReview File:application/pdf File |
author |
Istiqomah, Mufti , Prof. Dr. Endang Fauziati, M. Hum , Siti Fatimah, S.Pd. M.Hum |
title |
An Error Analysis In Writing Descriptive Text
Made By Students At The 7th Grade In SMP N 1 Gatak
In 2015/2016 Academic Year |
publishDate |
2016 |
topic |
L Education (General) LB Theory and practice of education LB1501 Primary Education |
url |
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/7/PUBLICATION%20ARTICLE.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/1/FRONT%20PAGE.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/4/CHAPTER%201.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/8/CHAPTER%20II.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/9/CHAPTER%20III.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/10/CHAPTER%20IV.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/16/CHAPTER%20V.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/17/BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/18/APPENDIX.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/19/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/43325/ |
contents |
The purposes of this research are: (1) to describe the types of morphological
error of writing descriptive text made by the seventh grade students of SMP N 1
Gatak in 2015/2016 academic year; (2)to describe the types of syntactical error; (3)to describe the types of discourse error; (4) to know the frequency of each error in
writing descriptive text; (5) to know the sources of errors. The type of this research is
descriptive qualitative research. The researcher uses linguistic category taxonomy
and surface strategy taxonomy by James in analyzing the data.
The result of this research is the researcher found 220 errors made by the
students, the errors are divided into three kinds of errors. The first type of error is
morphological error in wrong spelling (46 errors or 20,91 %). The second is
syntactical error (152 errors or 69,09%), this kind of errors are divided into seven
kinds of errors. The first is omission of –s/-es in plural marker (8 errors or 3,64%).
The second is error in Be, this error is divided into three: omission of Be (15 errors
or 6,81%); addition of Be (14 errors or 6,36%); misuse of Be (14 errors or 6,36%).
The third is omission of preposition (9 errors or 4,09%). The fourth is article, it is
divided into two: omission of article (8 errors or 3,64 %); addition of article (10
errors or 4,55 %). The fifth is omission of s/es for v1 after third person singular (20
errors or 9,09%). The sixth is error in pronoun, it is divided into three: omission of ‘s
in possessive pronoun (4 errors or 1,82 %); possessive for subjective pronoun (18
errors or 8,18 %); subjective for possessive pronoun (19 errors or 8,64 %). And the
last is misordering (13 errors or 5,91 %). The last type of error is discourse in
reference, 22 errors or 10%.
Key words: error analysis, descriptive text, linguistic category taxonomy, surface
strategy taxonomy. |
id |
IOS2728.43325 |
institution |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
institution_id |
249 |
institution_type |
library:university library |
library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
library_id |
555 |
collection |
Digital Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
repository_id |
2728 |
subject_area |
Agama Ekonomi Farmasi |
city |
KOTA SURAKARTA |
province |
JAWA TENGAH |
repoId |
IOS2728 |
first_indexed |
2016-09-22T02:55:56Z |
last_indexed |
2016-09-22T02:55:57Z |
recordtype |
dc |
_version_ |
1765810951840333824 |
score |
17.538404 |