Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln)
| Main Author: | Ardianto, Feri |
|---|---|
| Format: | Karya Ilmiah NonPeerReviewed application/pdf |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/1/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/2/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/3/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/5/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/6/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/7/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/9/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/10/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI%20KARYA%20ILMIAH.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/ |
| ctrlnum |
42003 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><relation>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/</relation><title>Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus
Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak
(Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln)</title><creator>Ardianto, Feri</creator><subject>K Law (General)</subject><description>The purpose of this study to know the implementation of elements of Section 363
subsection (1) 4th Criminal Code on criminal offenses of theft with the circumstances
aggravating done by children and to know the basic legal considerations the judge in
deciding the criminal case of theft with the circumstances aggravating done by
children, The method used is descriptive-analytic, with normative juridical approach.
The data source consists of primary data and secondary data including primary legal
materials, secondary, tertiary. Data were collected by literature study, then analyzed
by qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the application of
material criminal law against theft by state burdensome, namely Article 363
paragraph (1) 4th Criminal Code in accordance with the facts of the law, both the
statements of witnesses, expert testimonies and information from the defendant, only
in the application of sanctions the principle of restorative justice here is not used by
the judge, so it is not in accordance with Article 5 (1) of Law Number 11 Year 2012
on Child Criminal Justice System. While the basic legal consideration of judges in
deciding the case based on Article 193 paragraph (2) b in conjunction with Article 21
paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code, Article 194 Criminal Procedure Code and
Article 22 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code.</description><date>2016</date><type>Other:Karya Ilmiah</type><type>PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/1/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/2/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/3/BAB%20I.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/5/BAB%20II.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/6/BAB%20III.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/7/BAB%20IV.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/9/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf</identifier><type>File:application/pdf</type><language>eng</language><identifier>http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/10/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI%20KARYA%20ILMIAH.pdf</identifier><identifier> Ardianto, Feri (2016) Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. </identifier><relation>C100110158</relation><recordID>42003</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
eng |
| format |
Other:Karya Ilmiah Other PeerReview:NonPeerReviewed PeerReview File:application/pdf File |
| author |
Ardianto, Feri |
| title |
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus
Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak
(Studi kasus Putusan Pidana Nomor: 2/PID.SUS-Anak/2014/PN.Kln) |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| topic |
K Law (General) |
| url |
http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/1/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/2/HALAMAN%20DEPAN.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/3/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/5/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/6/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/7/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/9/DAFTAR%20PUSTAKA.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/10/SURAT%20PERNYATAAN%20PUBLIKASI%20KARYA%20ILMIAH.pdf http://eprints.ums.ac.id/42003/ |
| contents |
The purpose of this study to know the implementation of elements of Section 363
subsection (1) 4th Criminal Code on criminal offenses of theft with the circumstances
aggravating done by children and to know the basic legal considerations the judge in
deciding the criminal case of theft with the circumstances aggravating done by
children, The method used is descriptive-analytic, with normative juridical approach.
The data source consists of primary data and secondary data including primary legal
materials, secondary, tertiary. Data were collected by literature study, then analyzed
by qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the application of
material criminal law against theft by state burdensome, namely Article 363
paragraph (1) 4th Criminal Code in accordance with the facts of the law, both the
statements of witnesses, expert testimonies and information from the defendant, only
in the application of sanctions the principle of restorative justice here is not used by
the judge, so it is not in accordance with Article 5 (1) of Law Number 11 Year 2012
on Child Criminal Justice System. While the basic legal consideration of judges in
deciding the case based on Article 193 paragraph (2) b in conjunction with Article 21
paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code, Article 194 Criminal Procedure Code and
Article 22 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code. |
| id |
IOS2728.42003 |
| institution |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
| institution_id |
249 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
| library_id |
555 |
| collection |
Digital Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
| repository_id |
2728 |
| subject_area |
Agama Ekonomi Farmasi |
| city |
KOTA SURAKARTA |
| province |
JAWA TENGAH |
| repoId |
IOS2728 |
| first_indexed |
2016-09-22T02:55:21Z |
| last_indexed |
2016-09-22T02:55:24Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| _version_ |
1765810947166830592 |
| score |
17.538404 |