ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 62/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2021/PN NIAGA SBY TENTANG PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG PT BARATA INDONESIA

Main Author: Tambunan, Charl Lewis Jogi
Format: Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book
Bahasa: ind
Terbitan: , 2022
Subjects:
Online Access: http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/27393/1/180513271%200.pdf
http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/27393/2/180513271-1.pdf
http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/27393/3/180513271-2.pdf
http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/27393/4/180513271-3.pdf
http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/27393/
Daftar Isi:
  • In carrying out activities that generate state profits in the form of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), where SOEs are present with capital provided by the state and are state assets, as well as other companies that have debts to other parties, SOEs also have debts to other parties which, if not being paid can be declared bankrupt or by Postponement of Obligation for Payment of Debt, the regulation regarding bankruptcy and postponement of debt payment is regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Delay of Payment of Debt. PT Barata Indonesia was declared PKPU in the judge's decision to grant the PKPU request by its creditors. but whether the decision is in accordance with Article 223 . The method used in this study is a normative legal research method. The results show that the State-Owned Enterprise in this case is PT Barata Indonesia which was declared PKPU by the court in accordance with the provisions contained in the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU, but disharmony with other regulations makes the settlement of BUMN PKPU difficult and there is also legal protection.