COMPARISON BETWEEN USING AUTHENTIC AND NON-AUTHENTIC MATERIALS IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT
| Main Authors: | Apriyani, Yuni; Lampung University, Sukirlan, Muhammad, Huzairin, Huzairin |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article info application/pdf eJournal |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
FKIP UNILA
, 2015
|
| Online Access: |
http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/123/article/view/9683 http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/123/article/view/9683/6323 |
Daftar Isi:
- Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan signifikan antara siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan materi otentik dan non-otentik juga untuk menyelidiki materi pembelajaran reading yang paling cocok digunakan untuk siswa. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas dua di SMPN 1 Metro. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 52 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah soal reading tentang teks naratif. Hasil perhitungan Independent Group T-Test menunjukkan thitung>ttabel (6.016 > 2.009) pada nilai reading antara kelas yang menggunakan materi authentic dan non-authentic dengan signifikansi <0,05. Hal ini berarti H1 diterima bahwa ada perbedaan signifikan dari perbandingan materi pembelajaran reading antara materi authentic dan materi non-authentic dalam nilai reading pada tingkat kelas kedua di SMPN 1 Metro. This present study was aimed to find out whether there is a significant difference of students’ reading achievement between the students who are taught using authentic and those using non-authentic materials, and to find out which of the two materials is more effective to teach reading. The population was the second grade students of SMPN 1 Metro. There were 52 students as the sample. The instrument was reading test about narrative text. The result of Independent Group T-Test calculation showed that the tvalue >table (6.016 > 2.009) on the students reading achievement between those who are taught using authentic and those using non-authentic materials with p<0.05. It means H1 was accepted, that there was significant difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement between students who were taught by using authentic material and non-authentic materialKeywords: authentic material, non-authentic material, reading comprehension