Daya antibakteri campuran triantibiotik dibandingkan dengan khlorheksidin 2% terhadap biofilm bakteri enterococcus faecalis dari gigi non vital dengan kelainan periapeks = Antibacterial effectivity of triantibiotic mixture compared to 2% chlorhexidine against biofilm of enterococcus faecalis from tooth with periapical lesion
| Main Authors: | Hirania Soraya, author, Add author: RA Nilakusuma Djauharie, supervisor, Add author: Ratna Meidyawati E.H., supervisor |
|---|---|
| Format: | Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia
, 2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20424637 |
Daftar Isi:
- <b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Latar Belakang : Enterococcus faecalis merupakan bakteri yang mampu membentuk biofilm dan banyak ditemukan pada kasus kelainan periapeks. Tujuan : Melihat daya antibakteri campuran triantibiotik dibandingkan dengan klorheksidin 2% terhadap E. faecalis dalam biofilm. Metode : Menilai kekeruhan larutan E. faecalis dalam biofilm pasca pemaparan bahan uji, dengan ELISA reader. Hasil : Terdapat daya antibakteri campuran triantibiotik terhadap biofilm bakteri E. faecalis tetapi tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna dengan klorheksidin 2% (p>0.05). Kesimpulan : Daya antibakteri campuran triantibiotik terhadap biofilm E. faecalis sebanding dengan klorheksidin 2%. <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> Background : Enterococcus faecalis has the ability to form biofilm and is often found in cases of periapical lesions. Aim: To analyze the effectivity of triantibiotic mixture compared to 2% chlorhexidine against biofilm of E. faecalis. Method : Score the turbidity of E. faecalis in biofilm after immersion in antibacterial agent, with ELISA reader. Result : Triantibiotic mixture has antibacterial effectivity against E. faecalis biofilm but has no significant difference compared to 2% chlorhexidine (p>0.05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of triantibiotic mixture against E. faecalis biofilm is equal to2% chlorhexidine. ;Background : Enterococcus faecalis has the ability to form biofilm and is often found in cases of periapical lesions. Aim: To analyze the effectivity of triantibiotic mixture compared to 2% chlorhexidine against biofilm of E. faecalis. Method : Score the turbidity of E. faecalis in biofilm after immersion in antibacterial agent, with ELISA reader. Result : Triantibiotic mixture has antibacterial effectivity against E. faecalis biofilm but has no significant difference compared to 2% chlorhexidine (p>0.05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of triantibiotic mixture against E. faecalis biofilm is equal to2% chlorhexidine. ;Background : Enterococcus faecalis has the ability to form biofilm and is often found in cases of periapical lesions. Aim: To analyze the effectivity of triantibiotic mixture compared to 2% chlorhexidine against biofilm of E. faecalis. Method : Score the turbidity of E. faecalis in biofilm after immersion in antibacterial agent, with ELISA reader. Result : Triantibiotic mixture has antibacterial effectivity against E. faecalis biofilm but has no significant difference compared to 2% chlorhexidine (p>0.05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of triantibiotic mixture against E. faecalis biofilm is equal to2% chlorhexidine. ;Background : Enterococcus faecalis has the ability to form biofilm and is often found in cases of periapical lesions. Aim: To analyze the effectivity of triantibiotic mixture compared to 2% chlorhexidine against biofilm of E. faecalis. Method : Score the turbidity of E. faecalis in biofilm after immersion in antibacterial agent, with ELISA reader. Result : Triantibiotic mixture has antibacterial effectivity against E. faecalis biofilm but has no significant difference compared to 2% chlorhexidine (p>0.05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of triantibiotic mixture against E. faecalis biofilm is equal to2% chlorhexidine.