Daya antibakteri kitosan 2% dan klorheksidin 2% terhadap enterococcus faecalis dalam biofilm (uji laboratorik) = Antibacterial effectivity of 2% chitosan and 2% chlorhexidine against enterococcus faecalis on biofilm laboratoric experiment
| Main Author: | Priscilla Arlyta S, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
, 2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-6/20403874-T-Priscilla Arlyta S.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- [<b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Latar Belakang : Enterococcus faecalis merupakan bakteri yang mampu membentuk biofilm dan banyak ditemukan pada kasus kegagalan perawatan saluran akar. Tujuan : Melihat daya antibakteri kitosan dan klorheksidin terhadap E. faecalis dalam biofilm. Metode : Deteksi dan kuantifikasi E. faecalis dalam biofilm yang hidup pasca pemaparan bahan uji, dengan real time PCR. Hasil : Terdapat perbedaan jumlah bakteri yang signifikan antara kedua kelompok bahan uji terhadap kontrol (p ≤ 0,05), tetapi tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara kelompok kitosan dan klorheksidin. Kesimpulan : Daya antibakteri kitosan 2% terhadap biofilm E. faecalis sebanding dengan klorheksidin 2%. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> Background : Enterococcus faecalis has an ability to form biofilms and become a predominant bacteria that plays a major role in the etiology of persistent lesions after root canal treatment. Aim : To analyze the efficacy of chitosan and chlorhexidine against E. faecalis in biofilms. Methods : Detection and quantification of E. faecalis DNA that survive and live after immersing the biofilm in antibacterial solution, with real time PCR. Result : Statistically there is significant difference of living E. faecalis between chitosan and control and between 2% chlorhexidine and control (p ≤0,05). But there is no significant different between chitosan and chlorhexidine (p>0,05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of chitosan is equal to chlorhexidine against E. faecalis in biofilm., Background : Enterococcus faecalis has an ability to form biofilms and become a predominant bacteria that plays a major role in the etiology of persistent lesions after root canal treatment. Aim : To analyze the efficacy of chitosan and chlorhexidine against E. faecalis in biofilms. Methods : Detection and quantification of E. faecalis DNA that survive and live after immersing the biofilm in antibacterial solution, with real time PCR. Result : Statistically there is significant difference of living E. faecalis between chitosan and control and between 2% chlorhexidine and control (p ≤0,05). But there is no significant different between chitosan and chlorhexidine (p>0,05). Conclusion : Antibacterial effectivity of chitosan is equal to chlorhexidine against E. faecalis in biofilm.]