Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) dalam pembahasan penetapan RUU PERPU menjadi Undang-Undang = T(Territory Representative) representative in the second reading in the parliamentary proceeding to pass the bill of the emergency law as parliamentary act
| Main Author: | Siti Haniatunnisa, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
, 2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-6/20403809-T43103-Siti Haniatunnisa.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- [<b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Tesis ini membahas mengenai Kewenangan dan keikutsertaan DPD didalam Proses pembahasan penetapan RUU Perppu menjadi UU di DPR. salah satu RUU yang dibahas untuk mendapat persetujuan bersama oleh DPR dan Presiden ialah RUU tentang Penetapan Perppu menjadi Undang-Undang.Namun, Selama ini, DPD tidak pernah dilibatkan dalam pembahasan RUU tersebut. Padahal, materi muatan Perppu adalah materi muatan undang-undang. Di sisi lain, ada beberapa Perppu yang mengatur mengenai otonomi daerah, antara lain seperti: Perppu tentang Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Batam, Bintan, dan Karimun; Perppu tentang Otonomi Khusus Papua, perppu tentang penanganan Permasalahan hukum dalam rangka rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi wilayah dan kehidupan masyarakat di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam dan kepulauan Nias Provinsi Sumatra Utara perppu tentang pilkada, perpu tentang pemerintahan daerah Dalam penetapan RUU perppu selama ini tidak pernah melibatkan DPD hanya DPR dan Pemerintah di dalam pembahasannya. Berdasarkan UUD 1945 pasal 22D , UU No. 17 tahun 2014 tentang MD3 , UU Nomor 12 tahun 2011 tentang P3 tahun, dan tatib DPR RI tahun 2014 serta tatib DPD tahun 2009, dengan menyamakan mekanisme RUU penetapan perppu sama dengan mekanisme pembahasan RUU biasa yang diajukan dari pemerintah. Paska Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui putusan Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012 telah mengembalikan kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) sehingga kewenangan dan keikutsertaan DPD disempurnakan dengan disahkannya UU No. 17 tahun 2014 tentang MD3 dan tatib DPR RI 2014. RUU perppu merupakan RUU yang diusulkan oleh pemerintah, Hierarki perppu adalah setingkat/sama dengan Undang-Undang. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> This thesis discuss about the authority and the part of the second chamber ie. The Senate (territory Representative) in the Parliamentary Proceeding to pass the Bill. Also, Whether the second chamber ie. The territory Representative has rights to join the second reading of the discussion in the parliament to pass the emergency law as a parliamentary act. One of the bill that has to be passed by the parliament accoding to The Constitution of Indonesia ie. UUD 1945 , and this bill has to be discussed by the parliament and the government together to be agreed and passed as a law. The Bill Before been drafted as the bill in the parliamentary proceeding, is The emergency law that had been declared by the President as law for the emergency time. However, according to our research that the territory Representative never been included in that Discussion ie. In the parliamentary proceeding. Nevertheless, the substantive materials of the Bill of the emergency law same as the ordinary Bill. Also, some of the Emergency Act contained about the regional autonomy Such as : Perppu tentang Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Batam, Bintan, dan Karimun; Perppu tentang Otonomi Khusus Papua, perppu tentang penanganan Permasalahan hukum dalam rangka rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi wilayah dan kehidupan masyarakat di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam dan kepulauan Nias Provinsi Sumatra Utara perppu tentang pilkada, perpu tentang pemerintahan daerah. In the passing of the Bill, after the law had been declared by the President, then has to be drafted as Bill to be paseed through the Parliamentary Proceeding, The Regional Representative for all this time never been included in the discussion in the proceeding ie. In the second Reading. According to the UUD 1945 charter 22D , UU No. 17 2014 about MD3 , UU Nomor 12 2011 about P3 , and tatib DPR RI 2014 also tatib DPD tahun 2009. The mechanism in the reading of this Bill same as the mechanism in the reading of the ordinary Bill that has been suggested by the Government. After the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 92/PUU-X/2012 had given back the rights to the Second Chamber (regional representative), as result of this, the New law had been passed ie. UU No. 17 year 2014 about MD3 and New Tatib DPR RI 2014. The Bill of the Emergency Law is the Bill that has been Suggested by the Government, and the Hierarcy of the Bill as level as the Law that has been passed by the Parliament (Parliamentary Act). , This thesis discuss about the authority and the part of the second chamber ie. The Senate (territory Representative) in the Parliamentary Proceeding to pass the Bill. Also, Whether the second chamber ie. The territory Representative has rights to join the second reading of the discussion in the parliament to pass the emergency law as a parliamentary act. One of the bill that has to be passed by the parliament accoding to The Constitution of Indonesia ie. UUD 1945 , and this bill has to be discussed by the parliament and the government together to be agreed and passed as a law. The Bill Before been drafted as the bill in the parliamentary proceeding, is The emergency law that had been declared by the President as law for the emergency time. However, according to our research that the territory Representative never been included in that Discussion ie. In the parliamentary proceeding. Nevertheless, the substantive materials of the Bill of the emergency law same as the ordinary Bill. Also, some of the Emergency Act contained about the regional autonomy Such as : Perppu tentang Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Batam, Bintan, dan Karimun; Perppu tentang Otonomi Khusus Papua, perppu tentang penanganan Permasalahan hukum dalam rangka rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi wilayah dan kehidupan masyarakat di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam dan kepulauan Nias Provinsi Sumatra Utara perppu tentang pilkada, perpu tentang pemerintahan daerah. In the passing of the Bill, after the law had been declared by the President, then has to be drafted as Bill to be paseed through the Parliamentary Proceeding, The Regional Representative for all this time never been included in the discussion in the proceeding ie. In the second Reading. According to the UUD 1945 charter 22D , UU No. 17 2014 about MD3 , UU Nomor 12 2011 about P3 , and tatib DPR RI 2014 also tatib DPD tahun 2009. The mechanism in the reading of this Bill same as the mechanism in the reading of the ordinary Bill that has been suggested by the Government. After the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 92/PUU-X/2012 had given back the rights to the Second Chamber (regional representative), as result of this, the New law had been passed ie. UU No. 17 year 2014 about MD3 and New Tatib DPR RI 2014. The Bill of the Emergency Law is the Bill that has been Suggested by the Government, and the Hierarcy of the Bill as level as the Law that has been passed by the Parliament (Parliamentary Act). ]