Prediktor kesulitan intubasi pada ras melayu di RSUPNCM perbandingan antara rasio tinggi badan terhadap jarak tiromental, skor mallampati dan jarak tiromental = Predictors of intubation difficulty in patients in RSUPNCM malay race : a comparison between the ratio of height to tiromental distance, mallampati score, and tiromental distance / Rinal Effendi
| Main Author: | Rinal Effendi, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia
, 2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20350758-T-Rinal Efendi.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- [<b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Latar Belakang : Penggunaan penanda anatomis jarak tiromental (TMD) dan skor Mallampati banyak digunakan sebagai prediktor kesulitan visualisasi laring preoperatif, namun akurasi kedua penanda tersebut masih dipertanyakan. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi perbandingan tinggi badan terhadap jarak tiromental (RHTMD) sebagai salah satu prediktor kesulitan visualisasi laring kemudian dibandingkan dengan TMD dan skor Mallampati yang merupakan prediktor yang sudah ada sebelumnya Metode Penelitian : Data didapatkan dari 277 pasien yang dijadwalkan operasi elektif yang akan dilakukan anestesia umum. Pengukuran TMD, RHTMD dan penilaian skor Mallampati dilakukan preoperasi. Laringoskopi dan penilaian skor Cormack-Lehane dilakukan oleh residen anestesi minimal tahun kedua. Data kemudian diolah menggunakan SPSS 15 untuk mendapatkan nilai AUC, sensitifitas, spesifitas, nilai prediksi positif dan nilai prediksi negatif. Nilai AUC dari RHTMD, TMD dan skor Mallampati kemudian dibandingkan untuk memperlihatkan performa dari masing-masing prediktor. Hasil : Kesulitan visualisasi laring didapatkan pada 28 orang (10,1%), luas daearah dibawah kurva AUC RHTMD (85,5%) sedikit lebih baik dibandingkan TMD (82,7%) dan jauh lebih baik dibandingkan dengan skor Mallampati (61,4%), dalam hal ini peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa akurasi RHTMD lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan TMD dan skor Mallampati. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> Background : Preoperatif evaluation anatomycal landmark of TMD and Mallampati score has widely used to identify potentially difficult laryngoscopies; however it’s predictive reliability is unclear. This research purpose are to evaluate the ratio height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) as a new predictor of difficult laryngoscopies compare to thyromental distance (TMD) and Mallampati score. Methode : The authors collect data on 277 consecutive patients schedule to receive general anesthesia for elective surgery. TMD, Mallampati score and RHTMD are evaluated preoperatively. Residents of anesthesia minimum at second years performed laryngoscopy and grading (as in Cormack-Lehane classifications). all data processed with spss 15 to get the AUC, sensitivity, spesifity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The AUC of each predictor were compared to determine the perform Result : Difficult visualisation of the laryng occur in 28 patient (10,1%). The AUC of RHTMD (85,5%) is better compared to TMD (82,7%) and much better if compared to Mallampati score (61,4%). The authors conclude thatRHTMD had better accuracy in predicting difficult laryngoscopy than TMD and Mallampati score., Background : Preoperatif evaluation anatomycal landmark of TMD and Mallampati score has widely used to identify potentially difficult laryngoscopies; however it’s predictive reliability is unclear. This research purpose are to evaluate the ratio height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) as a new predictor of difficult laryngoscopies compare to thyromental distance (TMD) and Mallampati score. Methode : The authors collect data on 277 consecutive patients schedule to receive general anesthesia for elective surgery. TMD, Mallampati score and RHTMD are evaluated preoperatively. Residents of anesthesia minimum at second years performed laryngoscopy and grading (as in Cormack-Lehane classifications). all data processed with spss 15 to get the AUC, sensitivity, spesifity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The AUC of each predictor were compared to determine the perform Result : Difficult visualisation of the laryng occur in 28 patient (10,1%). The AUC of RHTMD (85,5%) is better compared to TMD (82,7%) and much better if compared to Mallampati score (61,4%). The authors conclude thatRHTMD had better accuracy in predicting difficult laryngoscopy than TMD and Mallampati score.]