Perbandingan luas dinding sepertiga apeks saluran akar yang tidak terpreparasi antara instrumen Osilasi Reciproc® dan WaveOne® esperimental laboratorik = The comparison of noninstrumented area at the apical third root canal wall after instrumented by Reciproc® dan WaveOne® Oscillation instrument / Ike Dwi Maharti
| Main Author: | Ike Dwi Maharti, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20337180-T33049-Ike Dwi Maharti.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- <b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Instrumentasi saluran akar masih meninggalkan area tidak terpreparasi. Insrumen osilasi diklaim dapat membersihkan dinding saluran akar secara optimal. Tujuan: Membandingkan luas dinding sepertiga apeks saluran akar yang tidak terpreparasi antara instrumen osilasi Reciproc® dan WaveOne®. Metode: Tiga puluh dua saluran akar premolar mandibula diisi tinta cina kemudian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok berjumlah sama (n=16): Reciproc® dan WaveOne®. Luas dinding yang tertutup tinta cina dianalisis dengan Adobe Photoshop CS5. Hasil: Kelompok II mempreparasi lebih banyak dinding tetapi tidak berbeda bermakna dengan kelompok I (p=0,265). Kesimpulan: Reciproc® dan WaveOne® tetap meninggalkan area tidak terpreparasi di sepertiga apeks saluran akar. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> Thirty five percents area of root canal wall was left uninstrumented after instrumentation. Oscillation instrument was claimed able to clean whole area of root canal walls. Objective: to compare uninstrumented area of root canal at the apical third after instrumented by oscillation instrument. Methods: Thirty two human mandibular premolar root canals were dyed with china ink and were divided equally into Reciproc® and WaveOne® group. The area was analyzed using Adobe Photoshop CS5. Results: WaveOne® showed a better result than Reciproc®, but not statistically significant (p=0,265). Conclusion: The Reciproc® and WaveOne® showed no difference in cleaning the root canal.