Kajian yuridis mengenai penerapan metode yardstick sebagai indirect evidence dalam pembuktian persaingan tidak sehat dalam kasus persekongkolan tender (putusan KPPU No 04/KPPU-I/2007 dan putusan KPPU No 07/KPPU-L/2004) = Juridical Studies of the application of yardstick method as indirect evidence in proving unfair competition in case of tender conspiracy (commission's decision No 04/KPPU-I/2007 and commission's decision No 07/KPPU-L/2004)
| Main Author: | Irvin Sianka Thedean, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310329-S43072-Kajian yuridis.pdf |
| ctrlnum |
20310329 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Kajian yuridis mengenai penerapan metode yardstick sebagai indirect evidence dalam pembuktian persaingan tidak sehat dalam kasus persekongkolan tender (putusan KPPU No 04/KPPU-I/2007 dan putusan KPPU No 07/KPPU-L/2004) = Juridical Studies of the application of yardstick method as indirect evidence in proving unfair competition in case of tender conspiracy (commission's decision No 04/KPPU-I/2007 and commission's decision No 07/KPPU-L/2004)</title><creator>Irvin Sianka Thedean, author</creator><type>Thesis:Bachelors</type><place/><publisher>Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia</publisher><date>2012</date><description>[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Persekongkolan tender telah menjadi sebuah fenomena yang tidak asing dalam
berbagai kasus persaingan usaha. Sulitnya pembuktian kasus persekongkolan
tender disebabkan tidak adanya satupun perjanjian yang dituangkan dalam bentuk
tertulis. Tujuan utama dari praktek persekongkolan tender tidak lain adalah
mendapatkan keuntungan yang sebesar-besarnya. Sebagai dampak nyata, praktek
persekongkolan tender telah menimbulkan kerugian yang sangat besar terhadap
keuangan negara. Pengadilan Amerika memperkenalkan suatu metode untuk
menghitung besar kerugian yang timbul sebagai dampak dari pelanggaran
persaingan usaha. Metode ini dikenal dengan nama Metode Yardstick dan sering
dipergunakan oleh Pengadilan Amerika dalam memutus beberapa kasus
persaingan usaha. Metode ini sangat mungkin diterapkan dalam kasus
persekongkolan tender serta diyakini dapat dijadikan sebagai indirect evidence
dalam membuktikan adanya persekongkolan tender.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
Tender conspiracy has become a familiar phenomenon in many cases of business
competition. The difficulty of proving tender conspiracy availibility is just
because none of the agreements set forth in written form by the parties. While in
common the main purpose of tender conspiracy is gaining profits as much as
possible. As the impact, tender conspiracy practices would bring a great loss of
state finance. US Court introduced a method to calculate the damage in antitrust
law's violation. This method is know as yardstick method and has been many
times used to solve some antitrust violation's cases. Yardstick Method is very
possible to be implemented in case of tender conspiracy and is believed to be as
indirect evidence in proving tender conspiracy., Tender conspiracy has become a familiar phenomenon in many cases of business
competition. The difficulty of proving tender conspiracy availibility is just
because none of the agreements set forth in written form by the parties. While in
common the main purpose of tender conspiracy is gaining profits as much as
possible. As the impact, tender conspiracy practices would bring a great loss of
state finance. US Court introduced a method to calculate the damage in antitrust
law's violation. This method is know as yardstick method and has been many
times used to solve some antitrust violation's cases. Yardstick Method is very
possible to be implemented in case of tender conspiracy and is believed to be as
indirect evidence in proving tender conspiracy.]</description><subject>Law and legislation</subject><identifier>20310329</identifier><source>http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310329-S43072-Kajian yuridis.pdf</source><recordID>20310329</recordID></dc>
|
| format |
Thesis:Bachelors Thesis |
| author |
Irvin Sianka Thedean, author |
| title |
Kajian yuridis mengenai penerapan metode yardstick sebagai indirect evidence dalam pembuktian persaingan tidak sehat dalam kasus persekongkolan tender (putusan KPPU No 04/KPPU-I/2007 dan putusan KPPU No 07/KPPU-L/2004) = Juridical Studies of the application of yardstick method as indirect evidence in proving unfair competition in case of tender conspiracy (commission's decision No 04/KPPU-I/2007 and commission's decision No 07/KPPU-L/2004) |
| publisher |
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| topic |
Law and legislation |
| url |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310329-S43072-Kajian yuridis.pdf |
| contents |
[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Persekongkolan tender telah menjadi sebuah fenomena yang tidak asing dalam
berbagai kasus persaingan usaha. Sulitnya pembuktian kasus persekongkolan
tender disebabkan tidak adanya satupun perjanjian yang dituangkan dalam bentuk
tertulis. Tujuan utama dari praktek persekongkolan tender tidak lain adalah
mendapatkan keuntungan yang sebesar-besarnya. Sebagai dampak nyata, praktek
persekongkolan tender telah menimbulkan kerugian yang sangat besar terhadap
keuangan negara. Pengadilan Amerika memperkenalkan suatu metode untuk
menghitung besar kerugian yang timbul sebagai dampak dari pelanggaran
persaingan usaha. Metode ini dikenal dengan nama Metode Yardstick dan sering
dipergunakan oleh Pengadilan Amerika dalam memutus beberapa kasus
persaingan usaha. Metode ini sangat mungkin diterapkan dalam kasus
persekongkolan tender serta diyakini dapat dijadikan sebagai indirect evidence
dalam membuktikan adanya persekongkolan tender.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
Tender conspiracy has become a familiar phenomenon in many cases of business
competition. The difficulty of proving tender conspiracy availibility is just
because none of the agreements set forth in written form by the parties. While in
common the main purpose of tender conspiracy is gaining profits as much as
possible. As the impact, tender conspiracy practices would bring a great loss of
state finance. US Court introduced a method to calculate the damage in antitrust
law's violation. This method is know as yardstick method and has been many
times used to solve some antitrust violation's cases. Yardstick Method is very
possible to be implemented in case of tender conspiracy and is believed to be as
indirect evidence in proving tender conspiracy., Tender conspiracy has become a familiar phenomenon in many cases of business
competition. The difficulty of proving tender conspiracy availibility is just
because none of the agreements set forth in written form by the parties. While in
common the main purpose of tender conspiracy is gaining profits as much as
possible. As the impact, tender conspiracy practices would bring a great loss of
state finance. US Court introduced a method to calculate the damage in antitrust
law's violation. This method is know as yardstick method and has been many
times used to solve some antitrust violation's cases. Yardstick Method is very
possible to be implemented in case of tender conspiracy and is believed to be as
indirect evidence in proving tender conspiracy.] |
| id |
IOS18064.20310329 |
| institution |
Universitas Indonesia |
| institution_id |
51 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
| library_id |
492 |
| collection |
Repository Skripsi (open) Universitas Indonesia |
| repository_id |
18064 |
| city |
KOTA DEPOK |
| province |
JAWA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS18064 |
| first_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:47:49Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:47:49Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1752180216048910336 |
| score |
17.13294 |