Kesetaraan masyarakat pluralis demokrasi sebuah analisa filosofis atas pemikiran Jacques Ranciere = Equality of pluralist democracy society a philosophical analysis on the thought of Jacques Ranciere
| Main Author: | Shane Antoinetta Christy Hehakaya, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310318-S43070-Kesetaraan masyarakat.pdf |
| ctrlnum |
20310318 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Kesetaraan masyarakat pluralis demokrasi sebuah analisa filosofis atas pemikiran Jacques Ranciere = Equality of pluralist democracy society a philosophical analysis on the thought of Jacques Ranciere</title><creator>Shane Antoinetta Christy Hehakaya, author</creator><type>Thesis:Bachelors</type><place/><publisher>Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia</publisher><date>2012</date><description>[<b/>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Skripsi ini merupakan telaah filosofis terhadap sistem demokrasi dalam
masyarakat pluralis saat ini, yang mana kondisi di dalamnya terjadi penyingkiran
subyek sehingga menjadi subyek bagian yang tak memiliki bagian. Hal ini
memberikan celah bagi terjadinya kesalahan hitung yang memunculkan kondisi
ketidaksetaraan. Praktik-praktik polis dalam masyarakat, melalui logika polisinya
memunculkan distribusi sensibilitas yang mengklasifikasikan subyek-subyek di
dalam sistem. Adanya pengklasifikasian dalam hal apapun menurut Rancière
merupakan kondisi ketidaksetaraan. Menanggapi masalah ketidaksetaraan ini,
terdapat solusi yang berpotensi memberikan jalan keluar, yaitu dengan cara
subyek berada dalam posisi politiknya untuk berpartisipasi secara aktif dalam
merebut kesetaraannya. Tindakan politik yang dapat dilakukan subyek adalah
dengan melalui disensus yang berwujud pada deklasifikasi. Terkait dengan
permasalahan di atas, polis juga tidak dapat begitu saja dihilangkan, namun cara
yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan terus menerus mengungkap apa yang
tersembunyi di dalam polis. Disensus sebagai jalan untuk mengkonfrontasi partisi
sensibilitas dengan cara berpartisipasi aktif sebagai subyek politik untuk merebut
kesetaraan. Upaya ini merupakan bentuk politik demokratisasi sebagai proses
disensus. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengingatkan kembali akan pentingnya
menyertakan seluruh subyek dalam sistem demokrasi, sehingga setiap subyek
dapat mencapai kesetaraannya secara aktif. Aspirasi yang diperjuangkan pada
tulisan ini merupakan suatu kritik terhadap sistem demokrasi yang menyingkirkan
subyek-subyek di dalam sistem.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
This thesis is an exploration of philosophical about democracy system in the
pluralist society today, in which the elimination of subject occurs. Therefore, this
would be the subject that is called the part that has no part. The calculation error
might arise and this also could lead to the inequality. Moreover, the police
practice in society that exists through its policy of logic will lead to the
distribution of the sensibility of subject classification in the system. According to
Rancière, inequality will occur whenever classification exists in whatever
situation. In regards to the inequality, there is an alternative that could potentially
solve this issue. This could be solved if the subject in their political position
participates actively in gaining their equality. For instance, subject can do a
tangible dissensus in declassification. In this case, it does not necessarily mean
that a police could be removed. It would be better if we do investigation
frequently to reveal something that is hidden in the police. Dissensus is a way to
confronting partition of the sensibility through the active participation in
achieving equality as a political subject. These efforts are form of political
democracy as a dissensus process. This thesis aims to remind us about the
importance of including the entire subject in the democracy system, and thus,
every subject can achieve its equality actively. The aspiration in this thesis is a
criticism toward democracy system that eliminates subjects in the system., This thesis is an exploration of philosophical about democracy system in the
pluralist society today, in which the elimination of subject occurs. Therefore, this
would be the subject that is called the part that has no part. The calculation error
might arise and this also could lead to the inequality. Moreover, the police
practice in society that exists through its policy of logic will lead to the
distribution of the sensibility of subject classification in the system. According to
Rancière, inequality will occur whenever classification exists in whatever
situation. In regards to the inequality, there is an alternative that could potentially
solve this issue. This could be solved if the subject in their political position
participates actively in gaining their equality. For instance, subject can do a
tangible dissensus in declassification. In this case, it does not necessarily mean
that a police could be removed. It would be better if we do investigation
frequently to reveal something that is hidden in the police. Dissensus is a way to
confronting partition of the sensibility through the active participation in
achieving equality as a political subject. These efforts are form of political
democracy as a dissensus process. This thesis aims to remind us about the
importance of including the entire subject in the democracy system, and thus,
every subject can achieve its equality actively. The aspiration in this thesis is a
criticism toward democracy system that eliminates subjects in the system.]</description><subject>Philosophy</subject><identifier>20310318</identifier><source>http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310318-S43070-Kesetaraan masyarakat.pdf</source><recordID>20310318</recordID></dc>
|
| format |
Thesis:Bachelors Thesis |
| author |
Shane Antoinetta Christy Hehakaya, author |
| title |
Kesetaraan masyarakat pluralis demokrasi sebuah analisa filosofis atas pemikiran Jacques Ranciere = Equality of pluralist democracy society a philosophical analysis on the thought of Jacques Ranciere |
| publisher |
Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| topic |
Philosophy |
| url |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20310318-S43070-Kesetaraan masyarakat.pdf |
| contents |
[<b/>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Skripsi ini merupakan telaah filosofis terhadap sistem demokrasi dalam
masyarakat pluralis saat ini, yang mana kondisi di dalamnya terjadi penyingkiran
subyek sehingga menjadi subyek bagian yang tak memiliki bagian. Hal ini
memberikan celah bagi terjadinya kesalahan hitung yang memunculkan kondisi
ketidaksetaraan. Praktik-praktik polis dalam masyarakat, melalui logika polisinya
memunculkan distribusi sensibilitas yang mengklasifikasikan subyek-subyek di
dalam sistem. Adanya pengklasifikasian dalam hal apapun menurut Rancière
merupakan kondisi ketidaksetaraan. Menanggapi masalah ketidaksetaraan ini,
terdapat solusi yang berpotensi memberikan jalan keluar, yaitu dengan cara
subyek berada dalam posisi politiknya untuk berpartisipasi secara aktif dalam
merebut kesetaraannya. Tindakan politik yang dapat dilakukan subyek adalah
dengan melalui disensus yang berwujud pada deklasifikasi. Terkait dengan
permasalahan di atas, polis juga tidak dapat begitu saja dihilangkan, namun cara
yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan terus menerus mengungkap apa yang
tersembunyi di dalam polis. Disensus sebagai jalan untuk mengkonfrontasi partisi
sensibilitas dengan cara berpartisipasi aktif sebagai subyek politik untuk merebut
kesetaraan. Upaya ini merupakan bentuk politik demokratisasi sebagai proses
disensus. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengingatkan kembali akan pentingnya
menyertakan seluruh subyek dalam sistem demokrasi, sehingga setiap subyek
dapat mencapai kesetaraannya secara aktif. Aspirasi yang diperjuangkan pada
tulisan ini merupakan suatu kritik terhadap sistem demokrasi yang menyingkirkan
subyek-subyek di dalam sistem.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
This thesis is an exploration of philosophical about democracy system in the
pluralist society today, in which the elimination of subject occurs. Therefore, this
would be the subject that is called the part that has no part. The calculation error
might arise and this also could lead to the inequality. Moreover, the police
practice in society that exists through its policy of logic will lead to the
distribution of the sensibility of subject classification in the system. According to
Rancière, inequality will occur whenever classification exists in whatever
situation. In regards to the inequality, there is an alternative that could potentially
solve this issue. This could be solved if the subject in their political position
participates actively in gaining their equality. For instance, subject can do a
tangible dissensus in declassification. In this case, it does not necessarily mean
that a police could be removed. It would be better if we do investigation
frequently to reveal something that is hidden in the police. Dissensus is a way to
confronting partition of the sensibility through the active participation in
achieving equality as a political subject. These efforts are form of political
democracy as a dissensus process. This thesis aims to remind us about the
importance of including the entire subject in the democracy system, and thus,
every subject can achieve its equality actively. The aspiration in this thesis is a
criticism toward democracy system that eliminates subjects in the system., This thesis is an exploration of philosophical about democracy system in the
pluralist society today, in which the elimination of subject occurs. Therefore, this
would be the subject that is called the part that has no part. The calculation error
might arise and this also could lead to the inequality. Moreover, the police
practice in society that exists through its policy of logic will lead to the
distribution of the sensibility of subject classification in the system. According to
Rancière, inequality will occur whenever classification exists in whatever
situation. In regards to the inequality, there is an alternative that could potentially
solve this issue. This could be solved if the subject in their political position
participates actively in gaining their equality. For instance, subject can do a
tangible dissensus in declassification. In this case, it does not necessarily mean
that a police could be removed. It would be better if we do investigation
frequently to reveal something that is hidden in the police. Dissensus is a way to
confronting partition of the sensibility through the active participation in
achieving equality as a political subject. These efforts are form of political
democracy as a dissensus process. This thesis aims to remind us about the
importance of including the entire subject in the democracy system, and thus,
every subject can achieve its equality actively. The aspiration in this thesis is a
criticism toward democracy system that eliminates subjects in the system.] |
| id |
IOS18064.20310318 |
| institution |
Universitas Indonesia |
| institution_id |
51 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
| library_id |
492 |
| collection |
Repository Skripsi (open) Universitas Indonesia |
| repository_id |
18064 |
| city |
KOTA DEPOK |
| province |
JAWA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS18064 |
| first_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:47:43Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:47:43Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1752180200104263680 |
| score |
17.13294 |