Pandangan paradigma realisme, liberalisme, dan kontruksivisme terhadap ASEAN Political Security Community 2015 sebagai kerjasama keamanan di kawasan Asia Tenggara
| Main Author: | Lesly Gijsbert Christian Hosang, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Bachelors |
| Terbitan: |
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia
, 2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20281057-Lesly Gijsbert Christian Hosang.pdf |
Daftar Isi:
- [<b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Ilmu hubungan internasional memiliki tiga paradigma utama; realisme, liberalisme, dan kontruktivisme yang khas dalam memandang institusi. Tulisan ini akan melihat dan membandingkan bagaimana ketiga paradigma ini memandang ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. Pada akhirnya, dapat diketahui keunikan dan kelemahan masing-masing paradigma dalam memandang kerjasama keamanan di Asia Tenggara ini. Realisme memandang security dilemma sebagai faktor kunci munculnya kerjasama, sedangkan liberalisme memandang institusionalisme sebagai faktor determinan. Di sisi lain, konstruktivisme menakankan pada identitas kolektif yang terkonstruksi di antara negara-negara anggota APSC 2015. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> International relations has three major paradigms: realism, liberalism, and constructivism that has distinct view on institution. This paper will compare how the three paradigms asses the ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. In the end, the uniqueness and weaknesses of each paradigm will be identified. Realism regards security dilemma as a key factor in the emergence of security cooperation, while liberalism sees institutionalism as a determinant factor. On the other hand, constructivism emphasizes on collective identity that is constructed among the member countries of APSC 2015., International relations has three major paradigms: realism, liberalism, and constructivism that has distinct view on institution. This paper will compare how the three paradigms asses the ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. In the end, the uniqueness and weaknesses of each paradigm will be identified. Realism regards security dilemma as a key factor in the emergence of security cooperation, while liberalism sees institutionalism as a determinant factor. On the other hand, constructivism emphasizes on collective identity that is constructed among the member countries of APSC 2015.]