Daftar Isi:
  • Proprioseiopsis ovatus (Garman) Amblyseiopsis ovatus Garman, 1958: 78. Amblyseius ovatus.— Moraes & McMurtry, 1983: 133. Proprioseiopsis ovatus.— Moraes et al., 1986: 121; 2004 b: 184; Chant & McMurtry, 2005 b: 15; 2007: 89; Denmark & Evans, 2011: 214. Proprioseiopsis antonellii Congdon, 2002: 15 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans, 2011: 214). Amblyseius cannaensis Muma, 1962: 4 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans, 2011: 214). Amblyseius hudsonianus Chant & Hansell, 1971: 723 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans, 2011: 214). Amblyseius parapeltatus Wu & Chou, 1981: 274 (synonymy according to Tseng 1983: 42). Amblyseius peltatus van der Merwe, 1968: 119 (synonymy according to Tseng, 1983: 42). Amblyseius (Proprioseiopsis) peltatus.— Ehara & Bhandhufalck, 1977: 71. Amblyseius punicae Gupta, 1980: 213 (junior synonym of P. peltatus according Gupta, 1986: 134). Specimens examined. One female, on Durio zibethinus, at Rayong Province, August 1994; three females, on Ipomoea pes -tigridis, at Rayong Province, February 1994; one female, on Durio zibethinus, at Chanthaburi Province, August 1994; two females, on Ipomoea pes -tigridis, at Rayong Province, February 1996; and one female, on Gossypium sp., at Nan Province, November 1999. Female Dorsal shield 329 (320–337) long and 268 (225–315) wide; j 1 26 (24–29), j 3 64 (60–68), j 4 6 (5–8), j 5 5 (5–6), j 6 11, J 5 8 (6–9), z 2 34 (31–36), z 4 22 (20–27), z 5 5 (4–6), Z 1 21 (18–25), Z 4 109 (105–115), Z 5 92 (83–96), s 4 100 (98–100), S 2 21 (14–25), S 4 16 (12–18), S 5 12 (10–15), r 3 21 (17–25), R 1 10 (10–11); distances between St 1 - St 3 54 (52–55), St 2 -St 2 73 (70–77), St 5 -St 5 92 (90–97); ventrianal shield 106 (100–115) long, 112 (109–115) wide at level of ZV 2; calyx of spermatheca 14 (12–17) long; fixed cheliceral digit 30 (29–31) long, movable cheliceral digit 31 (29–34) long; Sge III 27 (24–29), Sti III 24 (22–26), St III 28 (25–31), Sge IV 55 (45–61), Sti IV 37 (35–40), St IV 88 (83–90). Chaetotaxy: genu II 2, 2/ 0-2 / 0, 1; genu III 1, 2/ 1-2 / 0, 1. Previous records. Cosmopolitan, including Thailand (Provinces of Chachoengsao, Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai and Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Ehara & Bhandhufalck, 1977). Remarks. The females examined are slightly smaller than the holotype (dorsal shield about 10 % shorter), considering the measures given by Moraes & McMurtry (1983). Setae j 4, j 5 and z 5 are also about 30 % shorter, although setae Z 1 and S 2 are about 20 % longer. Our measurements are similar to those reported by Ehara & Bhandhufalck (1977) for specimens from Thailand and Moraes et al. (2004 a) for a specimen from Sri Lanka.
  • Published as part of Oliveira, Daniel C., Charanasri, Vatana, Kongchuensin, Manita, Konvipasruang, Ploychompoo, Chandrapatya, Angsumarn & De, Gilberto J., 2012, Phytoseiidae of Thailand (Acari: Mesostigmata), with a key for their identification, pp. 1-24 in Zootaxa 3453 on page 13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.282177