IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in payments for ecosystem services / compensation for ecosystem services (PES/CES) programmes
| Main Authors: | Sara Nelson, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | Usman Isyaku, Caroline Upton, Leah Bremer, Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza, Adeniyi Asiyanbi, Nigel Asquith, David Lansig, Jun He, Santiago Izquierdo Tort, Sue Jackson, Marta Echevarría, David González-Jiménez |
| Format: | info Lainnya Journal |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://zenodo.org/record/6516028 |
Daftar Isi:
- IPBES VA Chapter 4 - Literature & case study review on outcomes in payments for ecosystem services / compensation for ecosystem services (PES/CES) programmes / IPBES values assessment 4.7 Code: IPBES_VA_4.7 Versioning 01: (23.10.2020) Versioning 02: (14.01.2022) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4394520 Description The IPBES Scoping document for the values assessment highlights the need to assess the types of values of nature and valuation practices that have (or have not) been incorporated into decision-making, the challenges that have hindered the incorporation of diverse conceptualizations of values of nature in a range of decision and policy-making contexts, and the implications for decision outcomes. To this end, we conducted a literature and case-study review to examine how values are articulated by diverse stakeholders through payments for ecosystem services / compensation for ecosystem services (PES/CES) programs, including REDD+, to determine (1) what factors have been shown to influence PES outcomes, and by what mechanisms; and (2) how these factors relate to (mis)alignments among local and program values, institutions, and knowledge systems, in order to (3) assess the potential for plural valuation to enhance PES outcomes. We then augment this review with deep case studies that further examine how misalignments arise in PES and how they influence outcomes, and to identify (4) what value articulation processes are most effective at aligning local values, institutions, and knowledge systems with PES design and implementation; and (5) what contextual factors support/undermine these efforts.