Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus

Main Authors: Liao, Jhih-Rong, Ho, Chyi-Chen, Ko, Chiun-Cheng
Format: info publication-taxonomictreatment Journal
Terbitan: , 2021
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/4555631
Daftar Isi:
  • Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus (Oudemans, 1905) Seiulus rhenanus Oudemans, 1905: 78. Typhlodromella rhenana.—Evans & Momen, 1988: 210. Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) rhenanus.— Papadoulis et al., 2009: 127. Material examined. USA: one female (HAL 095G065) from Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae), 2 Nov 2006. Netherlands: one female (HAL 098B507) from Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae), 2 Oct 2009; one female (HAL 100B067) from R. officinalis (Lamiaceae), 19 May 2011; six females (HAL 101B182) from R. officinalis (Lamiaceae), 30 Mar 2012. Previous records. Africa: Algeria (Athias-Henriot 1957b), Tunisia (Kreiter et al. 2002). Asia:Azerbaijan (Gadzhiev & Abbasova 1965), Cyprus (Georghiou 1959), India (Narayanan & Ghai 1961), Iran (Khalil-Manesh 1973), Israel (Swirski & Amitai 1961), Kazakhstan (Andreeva 1966), Syria (Barbar 2013), Turkey (Çobanoðlu 1989a). Europe: Belarus (Sidlyarevich 1966), Belgium (Nesbitt 1951), Denmark (Hansen & Johnsen 1986), England (Nesbitt 1951), Finland (Tuovinen & Rokx 1991), France (Nesbitt 1951), Germany (Oudemans 1905 a), Greece (Papadoulis et al. 2009), Hungary (Kropczynska & Jenser 1968), Italy (Gunthart 1960), Latvia (Salmane & Petrova 2002), Moldova (Kolodochka 1980 b), Montengro (Mijuskovic & Tomasevic 1975), Netherlands (Miedema 1987), Norway (Edland 1987), Poland (Suski 1961), Portugal (Carmona 1962), Russia (Beglyarov 1957), Serbia (Radivojević & Petanović 1984), Slovakia (Fend’a 2010), Slovenia (Bohinc & Trdan 2013), Spain (Iraola et al. 1997), Sweden (Steeghs et al. 1993), Switzerland (Gunthart 1960), Ukraine (Kolodochka 1974). North America: Canada (Nesbitt 1951), USA (Nesbitt 1951). South America: Brazil (Diehl et al. 2012); Remarks. The species is distributed worldwide, except in Oceania. Chant (1959) reported the species after Oudemans (1905) described it. Subsequent researchers provided conflicting opinions on the species status. Evans & Momen (1988) examined the type materials of the species and related species and provided a detailed redescription.
  • Published as part of Liao, Jhih-Rong, Ho, Chyi-Chen & Ko, Chiun-Cheng, 2021, Predatory mites (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) intercepted from samples imported to Taiwan, with description of a new species, pp. 301-330 in Zootaxa 4927 (3) on page 315, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4927.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4542155