Anagrus (Anagrus) daanei Triapitsyn 1998
| Main Authors: | Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D., Triapitsyn, Serguei V. |
|---|---|
| Format: | info publication-taxonomictreatment |
| Terbitan: |
, 2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://zenodo.org/record/3844900 |
Daftar Isi:
- Anagrus (Anagrus) daanei Triapitsyn, 1998 Anagrus (Anagrus) daanei Triapitsyn, 1998: 93. Holotype ♀ (USNM). TL: USA, California, Reedley, Smeds vineyard. Anagrus epos: Scott, 1933: 6 [misidentification (Triapitsyn 1998)] (anatomy, biology); Doutt & Nakata, 1965: 586 [apparent misidentification in part (Trjapitzin 1995)] (biology, ecology); Doutt et al., 1966: 14 [apparent misidentification in part (Triapitsyn 1998)] (overwintering refuge); Jensen et al. 1969: 9 [misidentification in part]; McKenzie & Beirne, 1972: 1230 [apparent misidentification in part (Triapitsyn 1998), see under avalae] (biology); Doutt & Nakata, 1973: 382 [misidentification in part (Trjapitzin 1995)] (biology); Seyedoleslami & Croft, 1980: 625 [misidentification in part (Triapitsyn 1998) (host)]; Williams, 1984: 1 [apparent misidentification in part] (ecology); González et al., 1988: 25 [apparent misidentification in part] (ecology); Pickett et al., 1989: 552 [apparent misidentification in part] (biotype evaluation); Settle & Wilson, 1990a, 1462 [apparent misidentification in part] (parasitism rate); Settle & Wilson, 1990b: 878 [apparent misidentification in part] (behavior); Corbett et al., 1996: 30 [misidentification (Triapitsyn 1998)] (labelling with rubidium); De Santis & Fidalgo, 1994: 122 (catalogue) [NT]; Boivin, 1994: 237 (overwintering strategy); Corbett & Rosenheim, 1996b: 36 [misidentification (Triapitsyn 1998)] (tracking movement with fluorescent dye); Boivin, 2010b: 14 (number of larval instars). Anagrus sp. A, near epos: Trjapitzin, 1995: 250 (previous misidentification, distribution). Anagrus (Anagrus) daanei: Triapitsyn, 1998: 82 (key); Triapitsyn et al., 2010: 5 (key), 6 (description, distribution, hosts); Triapitsyn, 2015b: 12 (key), 30 (description, distribution). Anagrus daanei: Williams III & Martinson, 2000: 139 (hosts, overwintering sites); Martinson et al., 2001: 227 (insecticide and fungicide toxicity); James, 2005: 484 (attraction to synthetic plant volatiles); Morse & Stouthamer, 2005: 375 (collecting from host plant); Prischmann et al., 2005: 132 (managed and unmanaged vineyards); Morse & Stouthamer, 2006: 96 (molecular identification); Morse & Stouthamer, 2007: 95 (molecular identification); Prischmann et al., 2007: 43 (abundance, phenology on blackberry and wild rose; Jepsen et al., 2007: 600 (sulphur effect on reproduction); Wright & James, 2007: 19 (host plant, distribution); Lowery et al., 2007: 9 (host plant associations); Segoli & Rosenheim, 2013a: 1225 (fecundity, longevity); Segoli & Rosenheim, 2013b: 2499 (reproductive success); Segoli, 2016: 140 (density dependent parasitism); Wilson et al., 2016: 602 (leafhopper and plant hosts in CA); Wilson & Triapitsyn, 2017: 53 (mention). Nearctic hosts. Cicadellidae:? Dikrella spp., Edwardsiana rosae (L.), Erasmoneura variabilis (Beamer), Erythroneura anfracta Beamer, E. bistrata McAtee, E. comes (Say), E. elegantula Osborn, E. ziczac Walsh, Zonocyba pomaria (McAtee). Distribution. Canada: BC. USA: CA, MI, NY, WA.
- Published as part of Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V., 2020, Illustrated key to genera and catalogue of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera) in America north of Mexico, pp. 1-411 in Zootaxa 4773 (3) on page 54, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4773.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3821373