Micromechanical properties of beech cell wall measured by micropillar compression test and nanoindentation mapping

Main Authors: Petr Klímek, Václav Sebera, Darius Tytko, Martin Brabec, Jaroslav Lukeš
Format: Article
Terbitan: , 2020
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/3669001
ctrlnum 3669001
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Petr Kl&#xED;mek</creator><creator>V&#xE1;clav Sebera</creator><creator>Darius Tytko</creator><creator>Martin Brabec</creator><creator>Jaroslav Luke&#x161;</creator><date>2020-02-11</date><description>Wood exhibits very different behavior and properties at different scales. One important scale is the cell wall (CW) that is commonly tested by nanoindentation. Common nanoindentation provides important insight into the material but has limitations because it does not apply uniaxial stress and provides data from single spots. Therefore, the aim was to examine beech CW using two stateof-the-art techniques: micropillar compression (MCo) and nanoindentation mapping (NIP). The mean strength of the beech CW was found to be about 276 MPa and the mean yield stress was 183 MPa. These values were higher than those in most cited literature, which was attributed to the fact that libriform fibers from beech late wood were measured. Mean E obtained from MCo was about 7.95 GPa, which was lower than the values obtained on a macrolevel and about 61% of the value obtained from NIP. NIP also showed that E of the CW around the middle lamella (ML) was about 64% of the value at the location attributed to the S2 layer. Lower E from MCo may be caused by sinking of the micropillar into the wood structure under the load. Failure of the micropillars showed gradual collapse into themselves, with debonding at the S3 layer or the MLs.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/3669001</identifier><identifier>10.1515/hf-2019-0128</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:3669001</identifier><relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/739574/</relation><relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1437-434X</relation><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/innorenew</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</rights><subject>beech</subject><subject>cell wall</subject><subject>mechanical properties</subject><subject>micropillar compression</subject><subject>nanoindentation</subject><title>Micromechanical properties of beech cell wall measured by micropillar compression test and nanoindentation mapping</title><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Journal:Article</type><recordID>3669001</recordID></dc>
format Journal:Article
Journal
author Petr Klímek
Václav Sebera
Darius Tytko
Martin Brabec
Jaroslav Lukeš
title Micromechanical properties of beech cell wall measured by micropillar compression test and nanoindentation mapping
publishDate 2020
topic beech
cell wall
mechanical properties
micropillar compression
nanoindentation
url https://zenodo.org/record/3669001
contents Wood exhibits very different behavior and properties at different scales. One important scale is the cell wall (CW) that is commonly tested by nanoindentation. Common nanoindentation provides important insight into the material but has limitations because it does not apply uniaxial stress and provides data from single spots. Therefore, the aim was to examine beech CW using two stateof-the-art techniques: micropillar compression (MCo) and nanoindentation mapping (NIP). The mean strength of the beech CW was found to be about 276 MPa and the mean yield stress was 183 MPa. These values were higher than those in most cited literature, which was attributed to the fact that libriform fibers from beech late wood were measured. Mean E obtained from MCo was about 7.95 GPa, which was lower than the values obtained on a macrolevel and about 61% of the value obtained from NIP. NIP also showed that E of the CW around the middle lamella (ML) was about 64% of the value at the location attributed to the S2 layer. Lower E from MCo may be caused by sinking of the micropillar into the wood structure under the load. Failure of the micropillars showed gradual collapse into themselves, with debonding at the S3 layer or the MLs.
id IOS16997.3669001
institution DEFAULT
institution_type library:public
library
library DEFAULT
collection DEFAULT
city DEFAULT
province DEFAULT
repoId IOS16997
first_indexed 2022-06-06T04:24:21Z
last_indexed 2022-06-06T04:24:21Z
recordtype dc
merged_child_boolean 1
_version_ 1739477912992612352
score 17.538404