ПЕДАГОГІЧНА СПАДЩИНА В.О. СУХОМЛИНСЬКОГО У СУЧАСНИХ СОЦІОКУЛЬТУРНИХ КОНТЕКСТАХ
| Main Author: | А.А. Малишева |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article Journal |
| Bahasa: | ukr |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://zenodo.org/record/2545125 |
Daftar Isi:
- Article reviewed the main views on intellectual education in V.O. Sukhomlinskу’s holistic education philosophy as intellectual personal development. Sukhomlinskу emphasize the aspect of being truly human was a development of the intellect, so that the horizons of the mind grew ever wider, gradually encompassing the whole world and reaching into the depths of ideology/outlook space. Considered components of intellectual development: «processes of thinking», intelligent relation, scientific world. Sukhomlinsky fіrst describes each of the families his students came from and the impact of the war, and then goes on to describe a uniquely creative and therapeutic pedagogy he developed to meet the needs of the children in his care. Also Sukhomlinsky characterized of children’s thought, about the necessity of developing a child’s investigative thinking, and also about the fact that study involves work and will power, and is not just an amusement or a pleasant way of spending time. Оne of the educators with whose ideas is in harmony is Rudolph Steiner, who promoted a phenomenological approach to the instruction and education of children, more specifically: living experience, observation, description, refection, work of an investigative nature, the use of stories as a vital and graphic way of coming to know the world, and the view of a teacher as a spiritual mentor. Еducation viewed as a holistic process, and also because Sukhomlinsky ofen combines the word with a qualifer to produce expressions such as ‘moral education’, ‘aesthetic education’ and ‘intellectual education’, and the use of ‘upbringing’ in such expressions seems awkward. It was also important that learning the work of the intellects be associated with practical works which put their knowledge to use. Analyzed V. O. Sukhomlynskу’s creative heritage to identify experience, that can be adapted to the knowledge of social and cultural context.