ESTIMATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF UNCOMPLICATED CHOLECYSTITIS-SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Main Author: Mustafa Saeed Makki Almahasnah, Alaa eid Aljohani, Hassan Ali Alismail,Hassan A Al Wtayyan, Amal Yasir Alyousif, Rayan Jahz Alotaibi, Abdulrahman Ahmed Medawi , Abdullah Fuad Alhejji, Abdullah Hadi Saaty, Abdullah Saleh Assiri, Omar Abdullah
Format: Article Journal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: , 2018
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/1550125
Daftar Isi:
  • Background: Gallstone disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder in developed countries. However, symptoms can be severe, some people can be symptom free for many years after the original attack. Surgery is the current treatment of choice, but evidence suggests that observation is also feasible and safe. We reviewed the evidence on cholecystectomy versus observation for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: We searched seven electronic databases (last search June 2018). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised comparative studies where adults received either cholecystectomy or observation/conservative management for the first episode of symptomatic gallstone disease (biliary pain or cholecystitis) being considered for surgery in secondary care. Meta- analysis was used to combine results. A de novo Markov model was developed to assess the cost effectiveness of the interventions. Results: Two RCTs (309 participants) were included. Seventy-eight percent of people randomised to surgery and 45 % of people randomised to observation underwent holecystectomy during the 14-year follow-up period. Participants randomised to observation were significantly more likely to experience gallstone-related complications (RR = 6.69, 95 % CI = 1.57–28.51, p = 0.01), in particular acute cholecystitis (RR = 9.55, 95 % CI = 1.25–73.27, p = 0.03), and less likely to undergo surgery (RR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.34–0.73, p = 0.0004) or experience surgery-related complications (RR = 0.36, 95 % CI = 0.16–0.81, p = 0.01) than those randomised to surgery. Fifty-five percent of people randomised to observation did not require surgery, and 12 % of people randomised to cholecystectomy did not undergo surgery. Conclusions: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic gallstones. However, approximately half the observation group did not require surgery or suffer complications indicating that it may be a valid alternative to surgery. A multicentre trial is needed to establish the effects, safety and cost effectiveness of observation/con- servative management relative to cholecystectomy. Keywords: Gallstones, Cholecystectomy, Observation, Conservative management Systematic review, Cost effectiveness