Indonesia-English codes mixing on Facebook status of English Education Department students IAIN Padangsidimpuan
Main Author: | Hadawiyah, Rabiatul |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
, 2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://etd.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/6977/1/1720300053.pdf http://etd.iain-padangsidimpuan.ac.id/6977/ |
Daftar Isi:
- This research is intended to investigate code mixing on Facebook status of English Education Department students of IAIN Padangsidimpuan. The problem of this research are the students often use code mixing although they are in English Department, they still used code mixing in their utterance on Facebook status. The formulation of the problem in this research were: 1) What are the kinds of codes mixing in Facebook status used by English Department student in IAIN Padangsidimpuan, 2) What are the dominant codes mixing used by English Department Student in IAIN Padangsidimpuan. The purpose of this research was to find the kinds of codes mixing in Facebook status used by English Department student in IAIN Padangsidimpuan and to analyze the dominant codes mixing used by English Department Student in IAIN Padangsidimpuan. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. Source of the data was Facebook status from 10 students of English Education Department in IAIN Padangsidimpuan. Instrument of the collectin data was by using screenshoot of Facebook status and documentation correction sheets. The data collected from screenshot of Facebook status. Researcher analyze the data by preparing, looking, reading, coding and interpretating the data. The result of research showed that there are three types of code mixing suggested by Muysken theory. There were amounts of code mixing that had been done by participants were 21 times for insertion, 3 for alternation and 8 for congruent lexialization. So, the total were 32 times. Insertion code mixing was more often use than alternation and congruent lexicalization. It could be seen from this percentages, they used 68.75% insertion, while alternation 9.37% and 21.87% congruent lexicalization. So, the students of English Department IAIN Padangsidimpuan were dominantly used insertion than alternation and congruent lexicalization.