Daftar Isi:
  • This study aims to: (1) to analyze the level of consistency of planning and budgeting document which occurred in the Lembata district Year 2012- 2015; (2) look at the factors that cause inconsistencies; and (3) to formulate policy priorities. To answer the purpose, this study used a descriptive evaluative methods, which are categorized as qualitative stream. The informants include the executive, legislative, and NGOs. Based on an analysis tool Matrix Consolidated Planning and Budgeting, Analysis of Root Cause Analysis, and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the results showed that the documents of the most inconsistent is RPJMD-RKPD, while programs that have a risk of inconsistency so high is infrastructuredevelopment.