PERENCANAAN PERAWATAN MESIN FILLING DENGAN METODE MARKOV CHAIN UNTUK MEMINIMUMKAN BIAYA PERAWATAN DI PT. SWABINA GATRA
Main Authors: | Dyah Permatasari, Ika, Dahda, Said Salim, Fathoni, Muhammad Zainuddin |
---|---|
Format: | Article NonPeerReviewed Book |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://eprints.umg.ac.id/1444/1/14611015%20Dyah%20Ika%20Permatasari%20PERENCANAAN%20PERAWATAN%20MESIN%20FILLING%20DENGAN%20METODE%20MARKOV%20CHAIN%20UNTUK%20MEMINIMUMKAN%20BIAYA%20PERAWATAN.pdf http://eprints.umg.ac.id/1444/ |
Daftar Isi:
- PT. Swabina Gatra is a company engaged in the production of bottled drinking water, which has the brand "SWA". In the production machine consisting of cup filling machine, bottle and gallon often damaged beyond the machine maintenance planning time schedule. Damage to the machine resulted in cessation of the production process, decreased effectiveness of the machine and the swelling of maintenance costs, this caused a negative impact for the company because it can make consumers less loyal to this product. There are 2 proposals for Planning Filling Machine Maintenance to be more systematic and orderly ie corrective machine maintenance (return to good status) and preventive or preventive maintenance (return to previous status). For Filling Cup Machine use P3 proposal that is Corrective Maintenance on status 4 , Treatment of Prevention on status 2 and 3, for Bottle Filling Machine using P2 proposal that is Corrective Care on status 3 and 4 and Prevention Care on status 2, and for Galber Filling Machine using P1 suggestion that Corrective Care on status 4 and Prevention Care on status 3. Maintenance costs incurred by the company for engine maintenance planning Filling Proposal I takes 29 hours at a cost of Rp. 7,490,472. there is a savings of Rp. 14,600,678 (66%) of the real cost of the company amounted to Rp.22.091.150. While the planning of machine maintenance Filling for proposal II based on machine maintenance calculation that takes time for 2 hour with cost equal to Rp. 528,364, there is a savings of Rp. Rp. 21,562,787 (97%) of the real cost of the company amounted to Rp.22.091.150. so it is better to use is proposal II because it can minimize greater cost by 97%.