INTERAKSI EKSEKUTIF-BIROKRASI DI KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG
Main Author: | Alamsyah, Alamsyah; Dosen Jurusan Administrasi Negara FISIP Universitas Lampung |
---|---|
Format: | Article info application/pdf eJournal |
Bahasa: | eng |
Terbitan: |
JURNAL ADMINISTRATIO
, 2013
|
Online Access: |
http://publikasi.fisip.unila.ac.id/index.php/administratio/article/view/39 http://publikasi.fisip.unila.ac.id/index.php/administratio/article/view/39/40 |
Daftar Isi:
- This project seeks: (a) to describe the pattern of nexus executives-bureaucracy in Bandar Lampung municipality; (b) to analyze what are the determinants that influence those patterns; (c) to explain the implication of nexus executives-bureaucracy pattern to public policy process. It is probably useful: (a) to give new understanding to the political behavior of government agency, especially the institution of executive and bureaucracy, in local politics based on Law of 22/1999; (b) to recommend conceptual framework in order to identifying deficiency decentralization policy under Law of 22/1999; (c) to stimulate new ideas among post-graduated student, especially Public Administration Department, University of Gadjah Mada. This project applies qualitative-phenomenology as a method. Sample determined by purposive sampling. Technique of data gathering, data analyze, and verification of result research uses numerous techniques that developed in qualitative-phenomenology paradigm. Various determinants caused the integration of executives-bureaucracy in Bandar Lampung municipality. First, the executive character has decisions-making power, bureaucratic leaderships, charismatic, and very powerful in course of policymaking. Second, the character of bureaucracy maintaining narrow perspective, loyalties, mal-administration that legitimized culturally. Bureaucracy develops social interaction through the informal and formal patterns. Third, central governments remain to hold the substantive authority deal with to alternatives of procedure and substantive policy process in the bureaucracy at local government. Fourth, the bargain power of legislative has low when meet to executives and bureaucracy. Fifth, institution of state (as a representing by executives and legislative institution), remains too dominant in course of public policy. The executives-bureaucracy nexus tend to elitist and incremental. Public participation was low, substantive public policy does not serve public interest and abuses of power often happened.Key Words: executive-bureaucracy nexus, politics, bureaucracy character