IMPLEMENTASI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MALANG PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1172/PDT.G/2017/PA.MLG DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1208/PDT.G/2018/PA.MLG TERHADAP PEMENUHAN NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PUTUSNYA PERKAWINAN
| Main Author: | Halim, Elisariani |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis NonPeerReviewed Book |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/1/PENDAHULUAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/2/BAB%20I.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/3/BAB%20II.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/4/BAB%20III.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/5/BAB%20IV.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/6/LAMPIRAN.pdf http://eprints.umm.ac.id/45954/ |
Daftar Isi:
- Marriage is a physical bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy family. In the life of a household, of course every husband and wife wants a harmonious household life. But in reality there are still many couples who experience disputes or quarrels, so the only solution is divorce. As a result of the divorce, the mother or father is still obliged to care for and educate their children until they are adults. This research aims to determine the implementation of the decisions of the poor religious court on the fulfillment of the child after the termination of marriage, supporting and inhibiting factors in the fulfillment of the child after the termination of marriage, and the ex-wife's efforts to fulfill the child after the marriage breakup. This study uses a sociological juridical approach, using the Primary data type which is a decision Number: 1172 / PDT.G / 2017 / PA.MLG and decision number: 1208 / PDT.G / 2018 / PA.MLG. The technique of collecting data is in the form of observations and interviews with divorced parties. Based on the results of the research on the decision number: 1172 / PDT.G / 2017 / PA.MLG and the decision number: 1208 / PDT.G / 2018 / PA.MLG, that children join with their mothers, while fathers who bear the costs of maintenance and education while the implementation of the father has carried out his obligations in relation to the provision of child support, even though the amount of income provided is not always the same, this is because of a situation that makes a father unable to provide his full income. The conclusion is that the number of child livelihoods set by the Panel of Judges is correct and in accordance with a sense of justice and a father has carried out his obligations in terms of providing child support.