Lihat Juga

• Konsistensi putusan KPPU terhadap pelanggaran persekongkolan tender berdasarkan hukum persaingan usaha = The consistency of the KPPU decision against conspiracy of tender based on competition law
  oleh: James Erikson Tamba, author
  Terbitan: (2015)
• Kajian yuridis mengenai penerapan metode yardstick sebagai indirect evidence dalam pembuktian persaingan tidak sehat dalam kasus persekongkolan tender (putusan KPPU No 04/KPPU-I/2007 dan putusan KPPU No 07/KPPU-L/2004) = Juridical Studies of the application of yardstick method as indirect evidence in proving unfair competition in case of tender conspiracy (commission's decision No 04/KPPU-I/2007 and commission's decision No 07/KPPU-L/2004)
  oleh: Irvin Sianka Thedean, author
  Terbitan: (2012)
• Tinjauan yuridis persekongkolan tender menurut hukum persaingan usaha (studi kasus putusan KPPU 03/KPPU-L/2012) = Juridical studies of tender conspiracy according to the competition law (case study commission s decision No 03/KPPU-L/ 2012)
  oleh: Aryo Bimo, author
  Terbitan: (2014)
• Pembuktian persekongkolan tender yang dilakukan melalui perjanjian tidak tertulis (implied agreement) berdasarkan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam hukum persaingan usaha (studi kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 01/KPPU-1/2015) = Rules of evidence in related with bid rigging by implied agreement based on article 22 Indonesian anti monopoly and unfair competition in Indonesian competition law perspective (case study of Putusan Perkara Nomor 01/KPPU-1/2015)
  oleh: Budhi Satya Makmur, author
  Terbitan: (2016)
• Tinjauan hukum mengenai kesamaan ip address sebagai indikasi persekongkolan tender studi kasus putusan nomor 10 kppu l 2014 = Law review on the similarity of ip address as an indication of tender conspiracy case study of kppu verdict no 10 kppu l 2014
  Terbitan: (2016)